I Think More and More That We Can't Trust Any "Brand Name" Truthers...
Another amazing coincidence related to the WTC
Above you'll see a bizarre post on 911Blogger, famous for being home to shills, by Kevin Ryan. In it he speculates based on an anonymously provided set of blueprints that th explosives could have been put in the twin towers during fireproofing upgrades in 1999 and 2000.
Um yeah, whatever. First, who exactly provided him these documents and what's to say they are authentic. Second, did they really prepare this 1 or two years in advance? Third, what about all the explosives that were on floors not corresponding to the fireproofing upgrades? Or is Ryan really suggesting that only the areas that failed first were actually rigged?
Does anyone else feel like there was a reason for the purge last summer at the apartment, and that it was to prepare the way for a takeover by the "brand name" truthers and anyone willing to play the role of non-questioning sycophant?Â
- gretavo's blog
- Login to post comments
More fuel for the cognitive dissonance
In the AE thread, people are voting Vesa down into oblivion as if he were a troll, simply because he has some factual quibbles. The discourse environment is pretty poisoned over there.
Adding "sycophant" to my frequent use vocabulary
Not too long ago, I came across the term "sycophant" used to describe the obedient morons who refuse to question such things as the 9/11 OCT. I will admit, I had to look the word up in the dictionary. I knew it was not flattery, but I did not know exactly what it means. I think I like best what The Devil's Dictionary provides:
http://www.dict.org/bin/Dict?Form=Dict2&Database=*&Query=sycophant
SYCOPHANT, n. One who approaches Greatness on his belly so that he may not be commanded to turn and be kicked.